Category: ngb 36

Liefdevolle skerp prediking & God se wet en die grondwet

1. LIEFDEVOLLE SKERP PREDIKING, prof. dr. EE van Rooyen* (Bron: Die Tien Gebooie- populêr en prakties-stigtelike verklaring aan die hand van die Heidelbergse Kategismus, Bloemfontein: Sondagskool Depot, 1947: p. 153-155. Beklemtonings bygevoeg) JESUS ROEP ONS OP TOT SKERPE LIEFDEVOLLE WETSPREDIKING Vr.  114 Maar kan diegene wat tot God bekeer is, hierdie gebooie ten volle onderhou?... Continue Reading →

0

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 4: my own evaluation of the theonomic position)

PART 4: My own evaluation of the important contribution of theonomic postmillennialism by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] Previous articles: [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism... Continue Reading →

2

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 3: Reformed theonomic roots in church history, also in SA)

PART 3: REFORMED THEONOMIC ROOTS THROUGH CHURCH HISTORY, ALSO IN SOUTH AFRICA by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves in... Continue Reading →

12

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves frome their own sources?)

PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves from their own sources, in answer to CETE article’s accusations, according to the sources CETE uses but seemingly did not study? by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also... Continue Reading →

1

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 1: Introduction)

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA “Abstract: Although the extreme form... Continue Reading →

3

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑