Category: anabaptiste

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 4: my own evaluation of the theonomic position)

PART 4: My own evaluation of the important contribution of theonomic postmillennialism by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] Previous articles: [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism... Continue Reading →

2

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 3: Reformed theonomic roots in church history, also in SA)

PART 3: REFORMED THEONOMIC ROOTS THROUGH CHURCH HISTORY, ALSO IN SOUTH AFRICA by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves in... Continue Reading →

10

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves frome their own sources?)

PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves from their own sources, in answer to CETE article’s accusations, according to the sources CETE uses but seemingly did not study? by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also... Continue Reading →

1

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 1: Introduction)

An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA “Abstract: Although the extreme form... Continue Reading →

3

Die dwaling van baptiste dat die Nuwe Verbond net met ‘volwasse gelowiges’ is (hulle wat ‘n belydenis van geloof kan aflê), en nie ook met kinders van gelowiges nie

Die dwaling van baptiste dat die Nuwe Verbond net met 'volwasse gelowiges' is (hulle wat 'n belydenis van geloof kan aflê), en nie ook met kinders van gelowiges nie  In die hernude stryd in verband met die kinderdoop byvoorbeeld, is die wyse waarop die Skrifgegewens gehanteer word van die allergrootste belang. Hier kan nie met... Continue Reading →

1

Die Baptistiese verwerping van kinders as lidmate van die kerk: ‘n Paar opmerkings op John Piper se artikel oor besnydenis en doop

Die Baptistiese verwerping van kinders as lidmate van die kerk: 'n Paar opmerkings op John Piper se artikel oor besnydenis en doop Dr. John Piper se artikel oor besnydenis en doop kan hier gelees word: “How do circumcision and baptism correspond?” Hierdie artikel van Piper wys duidelik en mooi – na my mening – een van die... Continue Reading →

19

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑