CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIETY CONTRA TWO KINGDOMS THEOLOGY “Thus Christianity differs from liberalism in the way in which the transformation of society is conceived. But according to Christian belief, as well as according to liberalism, there is really to be a transformation of society; it is not true that the Christian evangelist... Continue Reading →
WAARHEID WOENSDAG LESING NOU BESKIKBAAR: Laat U Koninkryk kom: Teonomie of Two Kingdoms?
A. Die lesing kan hier gekyk word: Laat U Koninkryk kom: Teonomie of Two Kingdoms? B. Hier is ook die preek wat die lesing se onderwerp vanuit die Skrif inlei https://youtu.be/6NXNgv28pKA?si=3oaNK3M6BTNrJIEi C. Die boek waarop die lesing gebaseer is: Titel: Hoe lief het ek U wet! - Artikels van S. Le Cornu en ander skrywers... Continue Reading →
WAARHEID WOENSDAG LESING: Laat U Koninkryk kom: Teonomie of Two Kingdoms?
Ek gaan met bogenoemde lesing ook die volgende ringgebinde boek oor die onderwerp beskikbaar hê, as iemand belangstel om dit aan te koop, laat weet my asb as u solank 'n kopie wil bestel: Titel: Hoe lief het ek U wet! - Artikels van S. Le Cornu en ander skrywers oor die plek van die... Continue Reading →
Prof. Amie van Wyk oor tien sake van Calvyn se etiek oor die christelike lewe
'n Paar aanhalings uit prof. AH (Amie) van Wyk se boekie, 'Calvyn oor die Christelike lewe' Prof. Amie van Wyk se boekie (1983), gee 'n oorsig van sy verklaring van Calvyn se teologiese denke oor veral die etiek en die christelike lewe. Onder 'n paar temas of opskrifte wat ek byvoeg, wys ek op 'n... Continue Reading →
BOEKBEKENDSTELLING: Professor Dirk Postma (1818-1890)
BOEKBEKENDSTELLING: Professor Dirk Postma (1818-1890) Inleiding Dirk Postma was die eerste leraar van die Gereformeerde Kerke in SA (1859), asook die eerste professor van die Teologiese Skool in Burgersdorp (1869). Die standaardwerk oor Dirk Postma, "Professor Dirk Postma (1818 - 1890)" (deur Dr. G.C.P. van der Vyver, Pro Rege Pers, 1958) is nou ook elektronies... Continue Reading →
Die Gesagskrisis, prof. L. Floor
DIE GESAGSKRISIS deur prof. L. Floor* Die gesagskrisis is met ons, reeds vanaf die sondeval, toe die Satan gevra het, en die mens tragies hartseer gevolg het... het God werklik gesê (Gen. 3:1-5), en sal daar wees tot die laaste dag (2 Tim. 3). Christus het egter gekom om alle gesag te herstel en terug... Continue Reading →
DIE HERONTDEKKING VAN DIE ‘MOSAïESE REG’ GEEN ‘MODERNE AMERIKAANSE’ TEONOMIESE UITVINDSEL NIE, MAAR PRODUK VAN DIE 16de/17de EEUSE KERKREFORMASIE
DIE HERONTDEKKING VAN DIE ‘MOSAïESE REG’ GEEN ‘MODERNE AMERIKAANSE’ TEONOMIESE UITVINDSEL NIE, MAAR PRODUK VAN DIE 16de/17de EEUSE KERKREFORMASIE* “Maar jy, bly hier by My staan, dat Ek jou kan meedeel al die gebooie en die insettinge en die verordeninge (Hebr. mispat) wat jy hulle moet leer, dat hulle dit kan doen in die land... Continue Reading →
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 4: my own evaluation of the theonomic position)
PART 4: My own evaluation of the important contribution of theonomic postmillennialism by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] Previous articles: [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism... Continue Reading →
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 3: Reformed theonomic roots in church history, also in SA)
PART 3: REFORMED THEONOMIC ROOTS THROUGH CHURCH HISTORY, ALSO IN SOUTH AFRICA by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves in... Continue Reading →
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves frome their own sources?)
PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves from their own sources, in answer to CETE article’s accusations, according to the sources CETE uses but seemingly did not study? by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also... Continue Reading →