DIE GESAGSKRISIS deur prof. L. Floor* Die gesagskrisis is met ons, reeds vanaf die sondeval, toe die Satan gevra het, en die mens tragies hartseer gevolg het... het God werklik gesê (Gen. 3:1-5), en sal daar wees tot die laaste dag (2 Tim. 3). Christus het egter gekom om alle gesag te herstel en terug... Continue Reading →
BAVINCK OOR DIE CHRISTENDOM EN DIE PROBLEEM VAN OORLOG
BAVINCK OOR DIE CHRISTENDOM EN DIE PROBLEEM VAN OORLOG Inleiding In die lig van die inval van Rusland in die Oekraïne, hoe moet gelowiges, hoe moet die kerk van Christus dink oor die 'probleem van oorlog'? Herman Bavinck het in 1914, na die uitbreek van die Eerste Wêreldoorlog en daarna, die volgende twee artikels (asook... Continue Reading →
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 4: my own evaluation of the theonomic position)
PART 4: My own evaluation of the important contribution of theonomic postmillennialism by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] Previous articles: [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism... Continue Reading →
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 3: Reformed theonomic roots in church history, also in SA)
PART 3: REFORMED THEONOMIC ROOTS THROUGH CHURCH HISTORY, ALSO IN SOUTH AFRICA by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA] [PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves in... Continue Reading →
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves frome their own sources?)
PART 2: What does Theonomic Postmillennialism teach themselves from their own sources, in answer to CETE article’s accusations, according to the sources CETE uses but seemingly did not study? by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] [PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also... Continue Reading →
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” (PART 1: Introduction)
An Informed Reformed Theonomic Response on the extremely uniformed article “A Critical evaluation of Theonomist eschatology” by Slabbert Le Cornu[1] PART 1: Introduction & The unscholarly uninformed method of CETE and the two crucial main questions in this debate that are also of big importance for the reformed community in SA “Abstract: Although the extreme form... Continue Reading →
HEF DIE GENADE DIE WET OP? ‘n Verklaring van ‘n paar belangrike tekste oor die verhouding ‘wet en evangelie’
HEF DIE GENADE DIE WET OP? 'n Verklaring van 'n paar belangrike tekste oor die verhouding 'wet en evangelie' deur prof. John Murray Inleiding In aansluiting by die vorige skrywe (Bavinck oor wet en evangelie), sien die volgende Skrifverklarings van prof John Murray, waar hy o.a. die volgende teksgedeeltes aanspreek wat baiemaal verkeerd verstaan, verdraai... Continue Reading →
BAVINCK OOR WET EN EVANGELIE
BAVINCK OOR WET EN EVANGELIE - Christus bevry ons van die vloek van die wet, nie die norm van die wet nie - Inleiding Die oorbeklemtoning of misbruik maak van die wet, eindig in nomisme (wettisisme, legalisme), waar die wet ons red, dus redding deur wetsonderhouding. Die onderbeklemtoning van die wet lei weer tot die... Continue Reading →
BAVINCK OOR MOSES SE WET VIR VANDAG SE KERK EN SAMELEWING
BAVINCK OOR MOSES SE WET VIR VANDAG SE KERK EN SAMELEWING 'n verwerping van beide die 'liberale social gospel' en 'anabaptistiese antinomianisme' Inleiding Herman Bavinck het in 1891 'n lesing gehou oor hoe die Skrif, in die besonder die Mosaiese wet of reg, spreek tot sosiale vraagstukke, kerk en samelewing vraagstukke van sy dag. Hy... Continue Reading →
Christus en Kultuur by Bavinck: die Calvinistiese vs die Lutherse en anabaptistiese sienings
Christus en Kultuur by Bavinck Die Calvinistiese vs die Lutherse en anabaptistiese sienings Inleiding Die lesing van Bavinck sit uiteen die verskil wat daar is tussen die calvinistiese siening van 'Christus en kultuur', teenoor anabaptistiese en Lutherse sienings met hul 'twee koninkryke' leer. Daar is vandag calviniste wat ook hierdie 'two kingdoms theology' (sommige noem... Continue Reading →