Pip: PRO REGNO is back with the kind of reading that makes you set down your coffee and actually think — this time, Bavinck on the covenant of grace.
Mara: proregno has posted a translation of Herman Bavinck’s chapter on the covenant as the foundation of confession — the ground beneath everything a believer professes. Let’s start with what Bavinck actually argues that foundation is.
Bavinck on the Covenant as the Ground of Confession
Pip: The central question here is deceptively simple: what makes the covenant of grace different from the first covenant — and why does that difference matter for how we understand salvation at all?
Mara: Bavinck sets up the contrast sharply. The first covenant demanded obedience first, then promised life. The covenant of grace inverts that entirely, and here is how he puts it: “Die genadeverbond het dus heeltemal van God uitgegaan. Hy bring dit Self volledig tot stand. Daarom berus dit ook nie by die mens nie en hang dit nie van sy goedkeuring af nie. Dit is ewig, onveranderlik en onwankelbaar, soos God Self.”
Pip: So the upshot is that the covenant’s stability is borrowed entirely from God’s own unchangeableness — the human party contributes nothing to its foundation, only to its fruit.
Mara: Exactly, and Bavinck presses that further by distinguishing the covenant from a contract. It is not a mutual agreement reached by two parties deliberating together. He calls it an “instelling” — an ordinance, a gracious disposition of God, a gift in Christ. The blessings arrive, he says, like an inheritance: by free disposition, outside our will, without our choosing them.
Pip: That reframing does a lot of quiet work — calling it a testament rather than a treaty shifts who bears the liability if it fails.
Mara: And then Bavinck catalogs what the covenant actually contains. Spiritual blessings come first: forgiveness, regeneration, faith, repentance, sanctification, perseverance. But temporal blessings follow, because, as he writes, heaven and earth, spirit and matter, soul and body are too closely bound to be fully separated. The covenant reaches the whole person.
Mara: The post also carries Bavinck’s treatment of children of the covenant — they are not included because parents dedicate them, nor because of any merit of their own. They are included on the ground of God’s promise, born into the covenant from the first moment of their existence.
Pip: Which is where the baptism section lands. Bavinck ties the sign directly to the promise: baptism in the name of the triune God is the visible evidence that God has given himself in Christ and adopted the recipient as his child. That adoption, he concludes, is the very ground of confession.
Mara: The post frames this chapter as preparation for young people approaching the Lord’s Supper — it sits inside Bavinck’s book “De Offerande des Lofs,” translated as “The Sacrifice of Praise,” which proregno has recommended before and which is available in English through Monergism and Reformation Heritage Books.
Pip: So the whole arc runs from God’s eternal mercy, through the promise to Abraham, through baptism, to the table — and the believer’s confession is not the starting point but the response to something already secured.
Mara: The closing line of the chapter makes that sequence explicit: “In die doop gee God ons die sigbare bewys dat Hy in Christus Homself aan ons geskenk en ons as Sy kinders aangeneem het. En hierdie aanneming is die grondslag van ons belydenis.” Adoption is the foundation of confession — not the other way around.
Pip: That ordering matters more than it might first appear, and it’s worth sitting with before we close.
Mara: The covenant’s stability resting entirely in God’s character — not in human response — is the thread running through everything here.
Pip: It’s the kind of foundation that holds precisely because we didn’t build it. More from PRO REGNO next time.
Leave a Reply